Modern resistors are MILES better than the stuff most "vintage" designers could dream of.
Probable problems:
* Carbon-film mis-sold as "metal film". That's a rip-off, but not a problem: modern carbon film is WAY better than old carbon-composition, and in some ways better than wire-wound.
* Low Wattage. Everything is battery or wall-wart now, 1/4 watt is now standard unless it is 1/8 watt. Now, at least half the places I used to fling 1/2W parts could be fine with 1/16W or even 1/100W (what is the dissipation in a grid resistor?). But there are some places where you need real dissipation. 12AU7 plate resistors, 50L6 cathode resistor, bootstraps on a 40W Fisher stereo.
"Wattage" -may- also affect noise in some systems. bcarso said he traced excess hiss to some very small SMD resistors.
> see if it's within the 1% tolerance.
I suspect that is not a problem. It may be possible to buy rejects, but when there is a steady supply of specific values, it is probably regular production, same as they sell to Sony, Honda, Asus, Apple.
In the old-old days, they mixed rough proportions of clay and coal-dust, got a wide range of values, and bin-sorted. The rationalized number sequence is about being sure there is a bin for every possible random value. And I'm sure there is a machine to put the stripes on now.
But carbon-film is a potentially precise process. In small batches, 99% of parts may be 1% value. When pushing large batches for lowest price, 2%-off seems to be common, so I bet very few are 5% out.
And really: there are very few places in an audio system which need better than 5%. Gain-matching between left and right is about the only place I would aim tighter. OK, differential amplifiers with high CMRR. If something "depends" on 1% or the gig is ruined, the design should be re-considered.
I would look at the paint. Maybe there is a cheap way to do it perfect. And rough paint may have zero effect on function or life. And I have seen some very fine products which routinely had cosmetic blemishes. But pinholes, skips, bubbles, etc, would make me dubious.