Author Topic: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.  (Read 2201 times)

john12ax7

  • Member
  • Posts: 106
  • California, US
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #20 on: June 25, 2012, 01:13:35 AM »
Regarding pultec style, I often enjoy boosting and cutting the same frequency in the bottom end to make things sit better, program dependent though.
It's the well known springboard effect (exaggerated in the attached graph - done at simultaneous max boost & cut). Boosts LF while cutting low-mids.

Thanks for the graph. I knew it was a common technique, but didn't know the name or realize it could be so drastic. Is that a measurement or a simulation?


abbey road d enfer

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3268
  • Marcelland
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #21 on: June 25, 2012, 01:49:23 AM »
It's a sim. I had the opportunity to compare the sim with actual measurements and they were pretty close. As I said, this is exaggerated; most would apply only a few dB B&C, resulting in a less pronounced dip.
Who's right or wrong is irrelevant. What matters is what's right or wrong.
Star ground is for electricians.

riggler

  • Member
  • Posts: 883
  • Pennsylvania, USA
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #22 on: June 25, 2012, 10:09:12 AM »
Does this effect hold true with the Waves Pultec plugin?
Why does it happen? Because it happens - Roll the bones...

pucho812

  • Member
  • Posts: 6765
  • third stone from the sun
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #23 on: June 25, 2012, 01:21:44 PM »
Does this effect hold true with the Waves Pultec plugin?

it should as the waves plugin does mimic the curves of a pultec.
Every mic has a purpose it might be a door stop or a hammer, but every mic has a purpose.

abbey road d enfer

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3268
  • Marcelland
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #24 on: June 25, 2012, 01:41:35 PM »
Does this effect hold true with the Waves Pultec plugin?
From the Waves EQP1 page:
"The Pultec EQP-1A is renowned for its unique ability to boost and cut the same frequencies simultaneously, thereby creating a resonant shelf. "
Who's right or wrong is irrelevant. What matters is what's right or wrong.
Star ground is for electricians.

Biasrocks

  • Member
  • Posts: 1674
  • Windsor, On, Canada
    • Sharktank Productions
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #25 on: June 25, 2012, 01:48:38 PM »
Here's a screen capture of a 2db 60hz Pultec Boost, as you can see it's very broad.
http://SharktankPro.com

"I'd rather use an SPX90 than a UA plugin....." Joe Barresi

Biasrocks

  • Member
  • Posts: 1674
  • Windsor, On, Canada
    • Sharktank Productions
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #26 on: June 25, 2012, 01:50:14 PM »
Here's a 2db boost along with a 2db cut at 60hz. The cut is very subtle and affect the lowest frequencies.

http://SharktankPro.com

"I'd rather use an SPX90 than a UA plugin....." Joe Barresi

Biasrocks

  • Member
  • Posts: 1674
  • Windsor, On, Canada
    • Sharktank Productions
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #27 on: June 25, 2012, 01:50:52 PM »
Flat.
http://SharktankPro.com

"I'd rather use an SPX90 than a UA plugin....." Joe Barresi

0dbfs

  • Member
  • Posts: 802
  • Nashville / Atlanta / Memphis / Austin
  • Music is everything! Audio is everything else!
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #28 on: June 25, 2012, 01:59:07 PM »
I don't believe "2" is meant as 2dB on the controls. It's just 2 out of a possible 10. The manual states that there is 0-13.5dB low freq boost capable and 0-17.5dB low freq cut available in that 1-10 ranged control.

Anyway, somewhere between 7-10 on the controls will likely show a more pronounced curve on the display.

Cheers,
jonathan

EDIT:
Here is a link to the EQP-1A manual with the cut/boost info:
http://www.recproaudio.com/diy_pro_audio/diy_files/eqp_1a/PultecEQP.pdf
« Last Edit: June 25, 2012, 02:17:11 PM by 0dbfs »
Music is everything!
Audio is everything else!

Biasrocks

  • Member
  • Posts: 1674
  • Windsor, On, Canada
    • Sharktank Productions
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #29 on: June 25, 2012, 03:16:16 PM »
I don't believe "2" is meant as 2dB on the controls. It's just 2 out of a possible 10. The manual states that there is 0-13.5dB low freq boost capable and 0-17.5dB low freq cut available in that 1-10 ranged control.

My bad, my point was that Pultec's are pretty subtle tone boosters unless you really crank them.

Here's some graphs with more pronounced curves.

http://SharktankPro.com

"I'd rather use an SPX90 than a UA plugin....." Joe Barresi


Biasrocks

  • Member
  • Posts: 1674
  • Windsor, On, Canada
    • Sharktank Productions
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #30 on: June 25, 2012, 03:17:53 PM »
And with the same amount of cut.

http://SharktankPro.com

"I'd rather use an SPX90 than a UA plugin....." Joe Barresi

0dbfs

  • Member
  • Posts: 802
  • Nashville / Atlanta / Memphis / Austin
  • Music is everything! Audio is everything else!
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #31 on: June 25, 2012, 04:14:00 PM »
A little bit broad like you mentioned :)

Cheers,
jb
Music is everything!
Audio is everything else!

riggler

  • Member
  • Posts: 883
  • Pennsylvania, USA
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #32 on: June 25, 2012, 04:17:45 PM »
Ah, thanks guys!
Why does it happen? Because it happens - Roll the bones...

etheory

  • Member
  • Posts: 362
  • Sydney, Australia
    • evolutionarytheory
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #33 on: June 25, 2012, 06:54:36 PM »
The only thing that hasn't been mentioned here (unless I missed it via a quick re-read) is the massive phase shifts that occur at the boost/cut frequency.
I really don't think that the amplitude effects are the predominant ones here.

Being a largely digital producer, I often insert an 18dB or 12dB VST EQ HPF at sub-sonic frequencies (around 15-25Hz), in order to try and shape the phase response of a bassline so that it sits better in a mix.
In almost all cases, the result sounds "better" (subjectively) than the original. Also the phase change moves higher frequency peaks into areas of the waveform that are "tighter" - in fact, sometimes to the point of literally allowing you to increase the volume of an element in a mix without clipping. This type of shaping is very useful.

Sliding the frequency up and down a little bit of the HPF produces varied phase shifts that can "lock things in" so to speak.

Also, intriguingly, the shapes formed by basslines from digital synths after the HPF are much more like those coming from an analog instrument, than a standard VST. I feel that this is due to the phase response shearing that is more typical of analog gear.

Just worth mentioning - since I think that this is the REAL effect that the engineers are hearing, not the typical amplitude action of the EQ.

Biasrocks

  • Member
  • Posts: 1674
  • Windsor, On, Canada
    • Sharktank Productions
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #34 on: June 25, 2012, 07:28:56 PM »
Just worth mentioning - since I think that this is the REAL effect that the engineers are hearing, not the typical amplitude action of the EQ.

I've tried all sorts of Linear Phase eq's and have never felt the satisfaction that I get from a good old fashioned non-linear phase EQ.

I always ended up boosting huge amounts on the LP EQ's before getting the results I was looking for.

Pultecs, Langs and API's OH MY!

Regards,
Mark
http://SharktankPro.com

"I'd rather use an SPX90 than a UA plugin....." Joe Barresi

etheory

  • Member
  • Posts: 362
  • Sydney, Australia
    • evolutionarytheory
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #35 on: June 25, 2012, 08:18:30 PM »
I agree 100%
Smear that phase!

abbey road d enfer

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3268
  • Marcelland
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #36 on: June 26, 2012, 12:26:36 AM »
The only thing that hasn't been mentioned here (unless I missed it via a quick re-read) is the massive phase shifts that occur at the boost/cut frequency.
No. The EQP1 is a minimum-phase piece of gear (as most audio equipment); the phase-response is closely related to the frequency response. The LF control circuit are both 1st-order (6dB/octave asymptotes). The attached graph shows the phase-response at max boost and max cut; phase shift nevers exceeds 50°; no one can call it massive by any standards.
Quote
Being a largely digital producer, I often insert an 18dB or 12dB VST EQ HPF at sub-sonic frequencies (around 15-25Hz), in order to try and shape the phase response of a bassline so that it sits better in a mix.
Most of my tracks are HPF'ed, but not because of whatever effect it has on phase; I do because I know that anything below 30Hz has 99.9% probability of being garbage, and I don't want this garbage to create havoc with the detectors in compressors or with the loops in reverbs.
Quote

In almost all cases, the result sounds "better" (subjectively) than the original.
No doubt about it.
Quote
Sliding the frequency up and down a little bit of the HPF produces varied phase shifts that can "lock things in" so to speak.
Just worth mentioning - since I think that this is the REAL effect that the engineers are hearing, not the typical amplitude action of the EQ.
You are entitled to your opinions, but they certainly don't resonate with the most advanced results of scientific research on the subject. The hearing process has no way of perceiving phase of a single signal in the absence of a reference signal i.e. an original non-shifted version of the signal), and even then, the phase difference can be perceived only by the resulting interaction on frequency-response, by a drastic change of peak factor that would trigger non-linearities in the transmission path or by the time-difference in the case of binaural listening.
Quote
Also, intriguingly, the shapes formed by basslines from digital synths after the HPF are much more like those coming from an analog instrument, than a standard VST. I feel that this is due to the phase response shearing that is more typical of analog gear.
 
This is due to the big difference between ADSR in a digital instrument and the natural dynamics of signal when it is produced by a somewhat random combination of fingers, metal, wood, air, analog oscillators...
Who's right or wrong is irrelevant. What matters is what's right or wrong.
Star ground is for electricians.

abbey road d enfer

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3268
  • Marcelland
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #37 on: June 26, 2012, 12:31:03 AM »
This graph is with both Boost and Cut at max.
A frightening 70° phase-shift, consistent with a terrifying 7 dB/octave slope.
Who's right or wrong is irrelevant. What matters is what's right or wrong.
Star ground is for electricians.

Biasrocks

  • Member
  • Posts: 1674
  • Windsor, On, Canada
    • Sharktank Productions
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #38 on: June 26, 2012, 01:01:16 PM »
Phasey-smasey...  8)

Here's max boost @ 60hz.

http://SharktankPro.com

"I'd rather use an SPX90 than a UA plugin....." Joe Barresi

Biasrocks

  • Member
  • Posts: 1674
  • Windsor, On, Canada
    • Sharktank Productions
Re: shaping the bottom end on a stereo mix.
« Reply #39 on: June 26, 2012, 01:01:58 PM »
Max cut/boost @ 60hz.

http://SharktankPro.com

"I'd rather use an SPX90 than a UA plugin....." Joe Barresi