I listened to a few snippets of it - rife with conspiracy garbage and religious belief, so I can't give credence to any of it, but I'm not going to argue about it.I came across this vid about the WEF. It makes a lot of sense...
A new phenomenon:
"If you’re hearing about COVID arm a lot, you may be concerned that you will have this reaction. Keep in mind that COVID arm is relatively rare and never dangerous."I had a definite reaction inside my arm after one of my two covid vaccinations. The inner arm thickness(?) went away after a couple days and wasn't painful, but it didn't seem healthy. At the time I think they were calling it "Moderna arm" or something like that.
I survived.... so far.
JR
Weak response piece."In short, if you find yourself taking medical advice from embalmers, you are likely to find yourself on their table soon after."
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/a-...formation-about-blood-clots-in-died-suddenly/
Not a new phenomenon, and no objective link to vaccination.
And to say that the vaccines are causing these clots, without even knowing the vaccination status of the individuals, is as imaginary as is saying the 2020 US presidential election was stolen.hundreds of morticians and embalmers all over the world report a new phenomenon that affects 20-30% of corpses
Watch the video. Preliminary counts of four types of clotting were collected. The new clots are apparently not like other known clots. No one in "The Science" seems inclined to (rather, perhaps actively discouraged from) perform(ing) any evaluation of said clots.I'm not saying that these embalmers' findings do or don't exist. The incidence and type of clots should be evaluated before any conclusions are drawn, comparing pre-covid and pre-vaccine embalmer's clots to the current ones.
That's fine, but the embalmers with the clot data don't have visibility into vaccine status other than the sparse anecdotal info they've collected from some cooperative families. The gov agencies with vaccine data have shown no interest in studying the clots. One wonders why. If they really want to 1) dispel conspiracy theories, and 2) explain the non-vaccine basis for the new clots, why aren't they spending any effort at all (other than obstructionary ones)?I don't see any evidence for And to say that the vaccines are causing these clots, without even knowing the vaccination status of the individuals, is as imaginary as is saying the 2020 US presidential election was stolen.
Enter your email address to join: