My '72 BSA had an optional battery.
Pure kick (and kick and kick and kick...) start.
Pure magneto spark.
The magneto had a low-voltage AC winding and a rectifier. At fast idle it made ~10V, rising with RPM. A 15V Zener, 50 Watt, bolted to the frame, simply loaded-down the winding at high RPM. Now you could add lights; mine even had turn-signal lamps.
All lamps were blown when I got the bike. New ones blew quickly. I traced this to a bad connection on the Zener, let the voltage rise past 20V.
Putting in a battery meant you could run the lights with the engine off, a possible advantage.
That was a "dirt bike", really an englishman's go-to-work bike, dimly descended from racing motorcycles which looked like bicycles with an oil-spill. Your Kawa is a FAR more refined machine. If you are not racing for trophies, why would you want to run without the battery it was made for? It isn't like cycle batteries cost much.
"Replace that ...., environmentally destructive, lead acid battery."
Lead batteries are NOT a big hit on the environment, because sumthing like 99% of all battery lead is recycled. "All" car/truck owners leave the dud behind when they get a new battery. Battery makers pay less for recycled lead than new lead. Perhaps motorcycle riders who chuck the dud in the woods are ruining the planet; the answer is to slip your dead lead back into the system rather than heave it behind.
"you're losing a lot of weight. (Battery is 4lbs.- Bat-Pac is 2.5oz)"
350lb bike, 200lb me, 25lb leather and helmet and boots, 15lb lock, 10lb fuel.... 600 pounds, going to 596.16 pounds... 0.6% drop in weight, 0.6% improvement in performance.... yeah, makes sense if you are finishing a 3 minute race one second behind the winner every time.
>
it literally starts vibrating apart.
Then 0.6% and 1-second advantages are not your problem.
That Kawa 400 sure should do over 75 and should not shake apart. Compared to a Gold Wing it is a brutal beast, but it has power and was once well-assembled. It may be tedious to find every loose bit, and I'm not advocating excess speed in light of recent events in NJ. But it shouldn't be anywhere close to shake-apart at customary cruising speed.
Did you find
the Bat-Pac site and
read the teeny "Compatibility" section? "Brush type" isn't really the issue, though maybe it narrows the field enough to help. In my terms: a 1953 Chevy needs a battery to get the generator started and the sparks sparking; my present Briggs&Stratton doesn't.
Note also:
NON-COMPATIBLE ... Kawasaki - KZ6501977 and older! If that means "650 1977", you
may be OK, or Kawa may have improved the 650's dynamo in 1978 and used-up the pre-1978 dynamos on the cheaper 400 model for a couple more years. (Obviously this guy can't have one of every darn model ever made...)
If it works on "All magneto BSAs", then something's screwy. My beezer didn't need no capacitor, but sure as heck needed a voltage regulator or anything over 1,200RPM blew ALL the bulbs. But 1x1x2.5" is hardly enough surface area to throw-off the heat of a shunt-regulator and a good-size dynamo working at high RPM.
>
a mid 70s suzuki 750 3 cyl water cooled monster of a bike once 2 stroke with tuned pipes and a frame that moved with power that was scary
That was the improved version? IIRC there was a 500cc 2-stroke 3-cyl air-cooled (sorta) before that. It would WHUP Honda's finest at 2/3rd the price, until it burned-up the middle cylinder, except many of these got embedded in trees or bridge abutments, either due to inexperienced riders or uncertain handling. (Or was that a Kawa?)