Small Signal Circuits vs Discrete Opamp

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
*** there may be more than one "soundcraft" mic preamp.
Exactly! there is the original 2-transistors+1 opamp, the 2-transistor +2 opamps (both without NFB to the emitters), then the one with 2-transistors and two opamps and NFB to the emitters, the one with Szlikai inputs and 1 opamp, the one with 2-transistors and 3 opamps, and probably a couple others, not mentioning the early xfmr-based ones.
 
Exactly! there is the original 2-transistors+1 opamp, the 2-transistor +2 opamps (both without NFB to the emitters), then the one with 2-transistors and two opamps and NFB to the emitters, the one with Szlikai inputs and 1 opamp, the one with 2-transistors and 3 opamps, and probably a couple others, not mentioning the early xfmr-based ones.
Well, there goes that theory!

The Folio Notepad and Mackie 1202 had similar topologies.
 

Attachments

  • Notepad.png
    Notepad.png
    78.8 KB · Views: 2
  • 1202.png
    1202.png
    82.7 KB · Views: 2
I was directly comparing Folio Notepad with 1st gen Mackie 1202;
The preamp in the Notepad is the one with Szlikai inputs and one opamp. The Szlikai arrangement provides NFB to the input emitters, not really as good as real global FB from the 2 or 3 opamps types, but still quite good.
I don't know for sure for the original 1202, but seeing the original 8-bus had a similar arrangement (who copied whom?), they should not be too different.
The VLZ preamp is a different animal where the transistors are current loaded.
It's been claimed all Soundcraft mixers used same pres.
Whoever said that is ill-informed.
 
Last edited:
I sort of assumed the remark about Soundcraft pres referred to their lower-end products contemporary with the Notepad.
 
Could maybe be modded to a transformerless balanced input (ungrounding the other input)? I doubt the little stock trafos are much good.
Possibly. The only problem with that is the input you want to use for the second of the balanced input lines is loaded by the (variable) negative feedback gain setting network.

Cheers

Ian
 
Possibly. The only problem with that is the input you want to use for the second of the balanced input lines is loaded by the (variable) negative feedback gain setting network.

Cheers

Ian
Ah - good point.

Care to speculate what they were trying to achieve with that symmetrical input, rather than simply trafo followed by ring of three? Isolating the transformer from the feedback?
 
Last edited:
Ah - good point.

Care to speculate what they were trying to achieve with that symmetrical input, rather than simply trafo followed by ring of three?
Distortion reduction. At the cost of impairing stability and slew-rate.
IMO this additional transistor would have been much better used in the output, because the drive capability of this preamp is appallingly low.
 
Distortion reduction. At the cost of impairing stability and slew-rate.
IMO this additional transistor would have been much better used in the output, because the drive capability of this preamp is appallingly low.
Not that surprising - it was meant to sit alongside the Advent 201 cassette deck; the pre had hardwired RCA cables that were only about a 18" long; I imagine the deck's line in was probably fairly high impedance.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top