OK, I did some more A/B testing before I am commiting the HS-56 to the saw.
This is a 600:600 test done on a Pultec EQP-1A with CD music input for test signal.
Rod Stewart's "Do You Think I'm Sexy" was the track. (I know, laugh it up, but he's got a really good voice for testing, lots of weird subtle mid range, and the drums have a lot of crispy high end, anfd there's a pretty heavy bottom end also)
This time I tried a couple of UTC big boys, an LS-140 and LS-68. Brand new out of the box. One is a mic splitter, the other is a straight 600 in and 600 Hybrid (whatever that means) out with only one tap for 150 ohms. Both had about 50 ohms dcr, front and back.
I also tested a Lundahl 600:600. Unfortunatly the model number is on the bottom, tie wrapped to the chassis.
They were compared with my standard which is the Sowter 3603 I believe.
The Sowter has been winning the contest so far, even if ever so slightly.
The UTC mic splitter was the first one eliminated from the competition, due to a slightlynrolled off high end, probably due to the extra capacitance
The remaining UTC barely edged out the Sowter, due to a miniscule high end advantage, slightly beefier bottom, but it was very very close.
Next, the Lundahl vs the UTC and Sowter. The UTC and Sowter had better high end than the Lundahl. The UTC andSowter had a slightly better bottom end than the Lundahl.
I know, your saying "Hey, Lundahl's are supposed to kick ass! What's up?"
Well, the Lundahl did have one advantage over the UTC and Sowter, and that is something a bit hard to explain in words. It just had a different overall sound. The frequencies mixed and interacted with each other differently. Call it transparent, or whatever you want. Just a different sound stage you might say. Another weird thing about the Lundahl, when I eq the high end down as far as I could to concentrate on the bass frequencies, you could hear more high end still bleeding thru the Lundahl, where as in the Sowter and UTC, the high end was more effectively blocked by the equalizer. Strange.
So overall, the UTC and Sowter had a little better frequency response both top and bottom, but the Lundahl might have been more "musical" for lack of a better term. This subtle difference would require many more hours of listening, and many differnt kinds of music to come up with a definitive statement.
I am finding that different x-formers sound better for certain tracks than others. In other words, it's a balancing act, and while you might do an A/B test and say that brand X is better, change the track and guess what. The roles are reversed.
cj